The Ethics and Challenges of Facial Recognition Technology

HomeTechnologyThe Ethics and Challenges of Facial Recognition Technology
The Ethics and Challenges of Facial Recognition Technology


Key Takeaways

According to a report, the global facial recognition market is projected to reach $12.92 billion by 2027.

A study found that facial recognition algorithms have shown bias against gender and racial minorities.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation reports that over 50 US airports use facial recognition for passenger verification.

Facial Recognition Technology is a powerful tool with ethical challenges, including privacy and bias.

Regulations and public awareness are growing in response to these concerns.

Ethical innovations and alternative technologies are shaping the future of facial recognition.

Facial Recognition Technology has swiftly transitioned from a futuristic concept to an essential aspect of our daily routines. Powered by advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), this state-of-the-art technology presents a plethora of possibilities across various sectors, from enhancing security measures to streamlining healthcare services and marketing strategies. However, its widespread adoption has also brought forth significant ethical and technical hurdles that necessitate careful consideration.

In this analysis, we delve into the multifaceted realm of Facial Recognition Technology, examining its historical evolution, operational mechanisms, and extensive applications. Furthermore, we navigate through the intricate web of ethical dilemmas, technical complexities, and the evolving regulatory landscape that surrounds this technology.

Understanding the fundamental principles and functionalities of Facial Recognition Technology is paramount. At its core, this technology facilitates the identification and authentication of individuals by analyzing unique facial characteristics. Its evolution from a nascent concept to a versatile tool utilized across diverse domains like security, marketing, and healthcare underscores its transformative potential. However, this expansion also brings heightened scrutiny regarding ethical implications and technical constraints.

This discussion extends beyond unraveling the technical intricacies of Facial Recognition Technology. We delve deep into the ethical concerns it elicits, including issues of privacy infringement, bias and discrimination, and the potential erosion of civil liberties. These ethical challenges are intricately linked with the technology’s technical limitations, such as accuracy discrepancies and susceptibility to security breaches.

Moreover, we shed light on the evolving regulatory framework governing Facial Recognition Technology and the pivotal role of ethical guidelines in mitigating associated risks. By exploring the nexus between ethics, technology, and regulation, we aim to foster a comprehensive understanding of the dynamics surrounding Facial Recognition Technology’s ethical and technical landscape.

Introduction to Facial Recognition Technology

Facial Recognition Technology (FRT) has emerged as a transformative force in technology and security. This innovative technology is designed to recognize and verify individuals based on their unique facial features, driving its widespread adoption across various sectors.

Definition and Functionality

FRT is a sophisticated system that identifies individuals by analyzing and comparing patterns in their facial features. It utilizes hardware like cameras and image sensors along with complex algorithms to extract distinctive facial landmarks. These algorithms create unique facial templates for each individual, enabling identification and authentication.

Historical Development

The evolution of FRT dates back to the mid-20th century, with early systems using basic techniques. Significant advancements in computer vision, AI, and machine learning have revolutionized FRT, making today’s systems capable of real-time identity verification and emotion detection.

Types of Facial Recognition Systems

FRT comes in various forms tailored to specific applications:

State of Technology 2024

Humanity's Quantum Leap Forward

Explore 'State of Technology 2024' for strategic insights into 7 emerging technologies reshaping 10 critical industries. Dive into sector-wide transformations and global tech dynamics, offering critical analysis for tech leaders and enthusiasts alike, on how to navigate the future's technology landscape.

Read Now

Data and AI Services

With a Foundation of 1,900+ Projects, Offered by Over 1500+ Digital Agencies, EMB Excels in offering Advanced AI Solutions. Our expertise lies in providing a comprehensive suite of services designed to build your robust and scalable digital transformation journey.

Get Quote
  • 2D Facial Recognition: Utilizes standard images from cameras, widely used in smartphones and access control systems.
  • 3D Facial Recognition: Adds depth perception, creating a 3D map of facial features for high-security scenarios.
  • Thermal Imaging-based Recognition: Uses infrared cameras to capture heat patterns on the face, valuable in challenging visual recognition scenarios like low-light conditions or temperature screening during pandemics.

Applications in Society

FRT’s applications are diverse and expanding:

  • Access Control: Used for secure access to buildings, devices, and systems, reducing reliance on traditional authentication methods.
  • Law Enforcement: Aids in identifying criminals, locating missing persons, and enhancing public safety.
  • Consumer Electronics: Integrated into devices like smartphones and laptops for unlocking and authorizing transactions.
  • Airport Security: Employed for passport and boarding pass verification, bolstering border security.
  • Healthcare: Used for patient identification and vital sign monitoring, improving healthcare efficiency.

Research and Metrics

Studies show that FRT’s accuracy varies depending on factors like lighting conditions and dataset diversity. Metrics such as false positives and false negatives are crucial for evaluating system reliability. For example, a study by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) found significant differences in accuracy among different algorithms, highlighting the need for standardized evaluation metrics in FRT.

Ethical Considerations

Ethical concerns surrounding FRT include privacy infringement, bias, and discrimination. Research from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has raised alarms about potential misuse of FRT by law enforcement, leading to calls for regulatory frameworks to protect individual rights and ensure fair and accountable use of the technology.

In conclusion, while Facial Recognition Technology offers tremendous potential, addressing ethical challenges and ensuring technical robustness are critical for its responsible and beneficial integration into society.

2. Ethical Concerns Surrounding Facial Recognition

Facial recognition technology has sparked significant ethical concerns that delve into core aspects of privacy, fairness, and civil liberties. These multifaceted concerns require careful consideration during the development and implementation of such systems.

Privacy Invasion

A primary ethical concern linked to facial recognition technology is privacy invasion. The capability to capture and analyze an individual’s facial features without explicit consent can result in unwarranted intrusion into personal lives. Whether through surveillance cameras in public spaces or biometric data collection by private entities, individuals may feel exposed and vulnerable. This intrusion can extend to tracking movements, activities, and emotions without knowledge, prompting discussions about the boundaries between public and private life.

Bias and Discrimination

The presence of bias within facial recognition algorithms has garnered substantial attention due to its potential for discrimination. These algorithms are trained on datasets that may inadvertently reflect societal biases, leading to unequal treatment of various demographic groups. For instance, studies indicate that facial recognition systems may exhibit higher error rates for individuals with darker skin tones or specific ethnic backgrounds. Such bias can result in misidentification by law enforcement, perpetuate stereotypes, and worsen social inequalities.

Surveillance and Civil Liberties

The extensive use of facial recognition technology for surveillance has raised concerns about civil liberties and individual freedoms. Government agencies, law enforcement, and private entities utilize this technology to monitor public spaces, track individuals, and identify participants in protests or demonstrations. This surveillance can infringe on citizens’ rights to anonymity, free speech, and assembly, potentially leading to a chilling effect on democratic societies.

Ethically, facial recognition technology also raises questions about consent and data ownership. Individuals may not always be aware of their facial data being collected, stored, and possibly shared without explicit consent. This lack of transparency in data practices raises concerns regarding who owns this biometric information and how it can be utilized. Individuals should have the right to control their facial data and make informed decisions about its usage, especially concerning sensitive areas like employment, finance, or healthcare.

Research and Metrics

Research has shown that facial recognition systems can exhibit varying levels of accuracy and bias across demographic groups. Metrics such as false positives and false negatives are crucial for evaluating system performance and fairness. For example, a study by the MIT Media Lab found significant disparities in error rates based on gender and skin type, emphasizing the need for unbiased and transparent evaluation methods in assessing facial recognition technologies.

In conclusion, addressing these ethical concerns is essential to ensure responsible and equitable use of facial recognition technology. Stakeholders must collaborate to develop ethical guidelines, regulatory frameworks, and transparency measures that uphold individual rights, fairness, and societal well-being.

3. Technical Challenges and Limitations

Facial recognition technology, while holding promise, confronts several significant technical hurdles and limitations that impact its efficacy and dependability. This section will delve into three key technical aspects presenting challenges for facial recognition systems.

Accuracy and False Positives/Negatives

Achieving high accuracy in identifying individuals from images or video feeds is pivotal for dependable facial recognition. However, systems can struggle with discerning between similar faces, leading to false positives and false negatives.

False positives occur when the system mistakenly identifies a person not in the database as a match, potentially resulting in unwarranted suspicion or wrongful arrests, notably in law enforcement applications. Conversely, false negatives happen when the system fails to recognize a person in the database, possibly allowing unauthorized access.

Improving accuracy involves developing more advanced algorithms, utilizing larger and diverse datasets for training, and employing 3D or thermal imaging to capture additional facial features. These advancements aim to reduce false positives and negatives, enhancing the reliability of facial recognition technology.

Security and Vulnerabilities

Security vulnerabilities pose a critical threat to facial recognition systems due to their reliance on sensitive biometric data. Breaches or manipulations can have severe consequences, including hacking attempts, data breaches, and the use of manipulated images to deceive the system.

The emergence of deepfake technology, capable of creating convincing fake facial images and videos, exacerbates security risks. Protecting against such vulnerabilities necessitates robust cybersecurity measures, facial data encryption, and continuous monitoring for suspicious activities.

Furthermore, safeguarding facial recognition databases is crucial to prevent unauthorized access and data leaks, with privacy laws and regulations playing a pivotal role in setting data protection standards.

Data Privacy and Storage

Facial recognition data collection and storage raise significant privacy concerns. As a unique biometric identifier, facial data requires careful handling to safeguard individuals’ privacy rights. Issues arise when organizations collect facial data without clear consent or store it indefinitely.

Facial recognition databases are potential targets for cyberattacks and unauthorized access, posing risks of exposing sensitive personal information. Therefore, ethical considerations regarding data privacy are paramount.

Efforts to address these challenges involve implementing data protection regulations like the GDPR and advocating for user consent and transparency in data collection practices. Companies must adopt secure data storage practices and prioritize individuals’ privacy when employing facial recognition technology.

Scalability and Performance

Practical challenges in scalability and performance affect facial recognition systems, particularly in scenarios demanding real-time processing and handling large data volumes. Systems must manage numerous simultaneous queries efficiently and maintain quick response times as demand grows.

Ensuring effective performance in diverse environmental conditions, such as low light or adverse weather, remains a challenge. Scalability and performance issues can impede the adoption of facial recognition in critical applications like law enforcement and surveillance.

To tackle these challenges, ongoing research focuses on optimizing algorithms and hardware, developing specialized hardware accelerators, and implementing cloud-based solutions adaptable to changing demands. These efforts aim to enhance scalability and real-time performance, making facial recognition technology more viable in various applications.

Facial recognition technology operates within a multifaceted legal and regulatory framework, encompassing existing regulations and ongoing efforts to shape its governance.

Current Regulatory Landscape

The regulatory landscape for facial recognition technology varies widely across regions. In some countries, there are limited regulations, raising concerns about its widespread use without sufficient oversight. For instance, in the United States, facial recognition technology is subject to a patchwork of state-level regulations and company-specific policies due to the absence of a federal law specifically governing it. This fragmented approach has prompted discussions about privacy protection and individual rights.

Proposed Legislation and Guidelines

Recognizing the need for comprehensive regulation, many countries and regions are actively considering new legislation and guidelines. Proposed regulations often aim to balance innovation with privacy and civil liberties protection. For example, the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) includes provisions related to biometric data, including facial recognition. Similarly, several U.S. states have introduced bills to regulate facial recognition use by both government agencies and private entities. These legislative efforts reflect an increasing awareness of the ethical implications of facial recognition technology.

International Variations

Facial recognition technology encounters international variations in regulation and enforcement. Some countries have embraced it for security and law enforcement purposes, while others have implemented restrictions. China, for instance, has deployed widespread facial recognition surveillance systems, whereas the European Union has imposed limits on its use in certain contexts. These variations pose challenges for global companies regarding interoperability and data sharing across borders.

Enforcement and Accountability

Enforcing facial recognition regulations and ensuring accountability for violations are crucial aspects of the regulatory landscape. Collaboration between government agencies and industry stakeholders is necessary to monitor compliance and investigate potential misuse. Accountability measures may include fines, legal actions, or usage restrictions. Building public trust in enforcement measures is vital to addressing concerns related to privacy and bias. Additionally, establishing independent oversight bodies can help ensure regulatory compliance and protect individuals’ rights.

In conclusion, navigating the legal and regulatory complexities of facial recognition technology requires a comprehensive approach that balances innovation with ethical considerations and individual rights protection. Ongoing discussions, legislative developments, and enforcement mechanisms are crucial for fostering responsible and accountable use of this technology.

5. Bias and Fairness in Facial Recognition

Facial recognition technology has faced substantial scrutiny due to its inherent biases, which can result in unfair and discriminatory outcomes. Understanding the sources of bias is crucial for effectively addressing these issues.

Sources of Bias

One primary source of bias in facial recognition technology stems from the training data used for algorithms. If the training data lacks diversity and representation, the algorithm may develop biases that mirror the demographics of the data. For instance, if the dataset predominantly includes faces of a specific ethnicity or gender, the algorithm may struggle to accurately identify underrepresented groups. Furthermore, variations in lighting, poses, and expressions during data collection can introduce biases, reducing accuracy for certain individuals.

Impact on Minority Groups

Bias in facial recognition technology disproportionately affects minority groups. Studies have demonstrated higher error rates in identifying individuals with darker skin tones, women, and the elderly. These inaccuracies can lead to unfair treatment, especially in contexts like law enforcement, where misidentification can have serious consequences. The disproportionate scrutiny of minority communities can worsen these issues, amplifying the negative impact on marginalized groups.

Mitigation Strategies

Efforts to mitigate bias in facial recognition are crucial for promoting equitable and fair use of the technology. Improving the diversity and quality of training data by incorporating a wide range of ethnicities, genders, ages, and backgrounds is one approach. Additionally, developing algorithms that can detect and correct biases during identification processes is essential. Techniques such as re-weighting training data to address imbalances and reducing sensitivity to specific facial features are being explored.

Industry Initiatives

Recognizing the importance of addressing bias and fairness, the technology industry is taking proactive steps to rectify these issues. Leading companies are investing in research and development to create more unbiased facial recognition systems. Some have implemented temporary moratoriums on selling their technology to law enforcement agencies until effective safeguards against bias are in place. Industry initiatives also include collaborating with external organizations and experts to conduct third-party audits and assessments of algorithms for fairness.

By implementing these mitigation strategies and industry initiatives, there is potential to significantly reduce bias in facial recognition technology and ensure fair treatment for all individuals. Continued research, transparency, and collaboration are essential for fostering trust and addressing ethical concerns related to bias in this technology.

6. Facial Recognition in Law Enforcement

Facial recognition technology’s integration into law enforcement has brought both opportunities and concerns, shaping various aspects of policing.

Use Cases in Policing

Law enforcement agencies have embraced facial recognition for diverse purposes. One key application is identifying suspects or persons of interest from surveillance footage or images, aiding in criminal investigations and case resolutions. Additionally, facial recognition is utilized for crowd monitoring during events and protests, contributing to public safety efforts.

Public Concerns and Protests

The widespread adoption of facial recognition in law enforcement has triggered significant public concerns and protests. Citizens express worries about potential misuse, privacy infringements, and civil liberties erosion. Key concerns include biometric data collection without consent, the risk of misidentification leading to wrongful arrests, and the need for transparent and accountable practices. Protests have emerged in various cities, demanding transparency and accountability from law enforcement agencies.

Transparency and Accountability

To address public concerns, there’s a growing demand for transparency and accountability in facial recognition’s law enforcement use. Critics highlight the risks of inadequate guidelines and oversight. Some jurisdictions have responded by implementing policies mandating disclosure of facial recognition use by law enforcement, requiring warrants for specific deployments, and establishing auditing mechanisms to ensure legal and ethical compliance.

Alternatives and Reforms

Amid ethical and privacy challenges, discussions center on alternatives and reforms in law enforcement’s facial recognition practices. Suggestions include adopting non-biometric investigative methods like enhanced community policing and officer de-escalation training. Moreover, calls for comprehensive reforms emphasize clear usage guidelines, application limitations, and regular effectiveness evaluations. These reforms aim to balance leveraging technology for public safety with safeguarding individual rights.

In navigating facial recognition’s role in law enforcement, ongoing dialogues, stakeholder collaboration, and policy reforms are crucial for fostering trust, upholding privacy, and ensuring equitable and accountable policing practices.

7. Commercial Use of Facial Recognition

Marketing and Personalization

Facial Recognition Technology is increasingly utilized in the commercial sector to bolster marketing strategies and personalize customer experiences. Businesses leverage this technology to analyze customer demographics and behaviors, gaining insights into preferences and emotions. This data informs tailored marketing approaches, such as customized advertisements and product recommendations. For instance, stores can identify returning customers through facial recognition, offering personalized discounts based on past purchases, thus enhancing shopping experiences.

However, the commercial use of facial recognition raises concerns regarding customer consent and privacy. Many customers may not be aware that their facial data is being collected and analyzed. Businesses must establish clear policies on data collection and usage, including obtaining explicit consent and informing customers about data utilization. Ensuring transparent consent mechanisms allows customers to make informed decisions and opt out if desired, fostering trust in the business-consumer relationship.

Surveillance in Retail

Facial recognition technology is also employed in the retail industry for surveillance and security purposes, identifying shoplifters or individuals engaged in fraudulent activities. While enhancing security is beneficial, excessive monitoring can make customers feel uncomfortable or invaded. Striking a balance between security and respecting privacy is crucial, with businesses needing transparent policies and clear signage to address customer concerns about surveillance.

Facial Recognition in Banking

In the financial sector, facial recognition technology is adopted for identity verification and fraud prevention. Banks use facial recognition as a biometric authentication method, simplifying access to accounts and transactions. However, this raises data security questions and the risk of unauthorized access. Financial institutions must implement robust security measures to safeguard facial data and ensure regulatory compliance, addressing privacy and security concerns associated with facial recognition in banking services.

8. Technological Advancements

Technology is in a constant state of evolution, and facial recognition has seen significant advancements in recent years that have reshaped its capabilities. Here are four key technological advancements in facial recognition:

AI and Machine Learning

Integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) has been pivotal in enhancing facial recognition systems’ accuracy and efficiency. Machine learning algorithms can analyze vast datasets of facial images, improving recognition abilities over time. This adaptability has significantly enhanced facial recognition accuracy, making it more reliable for both commercial and security applications.

3D and Thermal Imaging

Traditional 2D facial recognition systems face limitations in challenging lighting conditions or with 2D images of 3D faces. To address this, 3D and Thermal Imaging technologies have emerged as valuable advancements. 3D systems capture depth information, providing a more accurate representation of faces, while thermal imaging detects heat patterns, making recognition less reliant on visible light. These technologies improve accuracy, especially in low-light environments, and are widely used in security applications.

Deepfake Detection

With the rise of deepfake technology for malicious purposes, the development of deepfake detection methods has become crucial. Deepfakes are digitally altered videos or images that convincingly change a person’s appearance or speech. Facial recognition systems now incorporate deepfake detection algorithms to differentiate between real and manipulated faces, ensuring the integrity and trustworthiness of these systems, particularly in law enforcement and media verification.

Edge Computing and IoT

Facial recognition deployment is no longer limited to data centers or powerful computers. Edge Computing, combined with the Internet of Things (IoT), has enabled facial recognition integration into various edge devices and applications. This means devices like smartphones, cameras, and smart doorbells can perform facial recognition locally without heavy reliance on cloud services. This not only improves response times but also enhances privacy by minimizing the need to transmit sensitive data over the internet.

9. Ethical Guidelines and Frameworks

Development of Ethical Guidelines

As facial recognition technology continues to expand its applications, the development of ethical guidelines has become crucial. Various stakeholders, including technology companies, privacy advocates, and government bodies, are actively involved in creating these guidelines. The aim is to define responsible and ethical practices in using facial recognition, addressing issues such as privacy, bias, and consent. Collaborative efforts involving experts from ethics, law, and technology fields work towards establishing principles guiding both development and deployment of facial recognition systems.

Industry Adoption

The adoption of ethical guidelines within the industry is vital to ensure responsible use of facial recognition technology. Many technology giants like Google, Microsoft, and Amazon have acknowledged the importance of ethical considerations and integrated these guidelines into their practices. This includes commitments to strict ethical standards governing their facial recognition products. Regular review and updates of these guidelines are necessary to align with evolving ethical standards and technological advancements.

Auditing and Certification

Auditing and certification mechanisms play a significant role in enforcing adherence to ethical guidelines in the facial recognition industry. Independent organizations and regulatory bodies conduct audits to ensure companies comply with established ethical standards. Certification processes provide approval for companies demonstrating responsible technology use. This builds trust with consumers and regulators, signaling that facial recognition systems are ethically developed and deployed.

Public Awareness and Education

Public awareness of ethical guidelines and implications of facial recognition technology is crucial. Awareness campaigns and educational initiatives inform individuals about technology risks and benefits, empowering informed decisions about consent and data privacy. Materials, workshops, and online resources help the public understand facial recognition nuances and ethical considerations. Raising awareness and providing education enables society to actively participate in discussions on responsible technology use.

10. The Future of Facial Recognition

Ethical Innovations

In the future of facial recognition technology, ethical considerations will be paramount. As society becomes more aware of the ethical challenges posed by this technology, there will be a growing demand for ethical innovations. Companies and developers will invest in research and development to create facial recognition systems prioritizing privacy, fairness, and transparency. These innovations may include advanced algorithms to reduce bias, robust data protection mechanisms, and systems requiring explicit user consent for data collection. By addressing concerns related to privacy invasion and discrimination, these innovations aim to ensure more responsible and morally sound use of facial recognition technology.

Increased Regulation

Anticipated in the future of facial recognition technology is an increase in regulation. Governments and regulatory bodies globally are acknowledging the need for comprehensive laws and guidelines governing facial recognition use. This regulation will cover data protection, consent requirements, surveillance limitations, and penalties for misuse. Companies operating in this space will need to comply with strict rules to ensure ethical and legal use, leading to more responsible and accountable industry practices, thereby reducing risks related to privacy violations and biased algorithms.

Public Opinion and Acceptance

The future of facial recognition technology will be shaped by public opinion and acceptance. As awareness of the technology’s capabilities and drawbacks spreads, public sentiment will influence its trajectory. While some may embrace facial recognition for convenience, others will express concerns about privacy and surveillance. Public debates will lead to increased scrutiny and calls for transparency. Companies and governments will engage with the public to build trust and address concerns, impacting adoption and acceptance of facial recognition technology across sectors.

Alternatives and Emerging Technologies

In response to ethical and regulatory challenges, alternatives and innovative solutions will emerge. These may include biometric authentication methods like fingerprint or iris scanning, providing robust security without some privacy concerns of facial recognition. Emerging technologies such as blockchain-based identity management and decentralized authentication systems may also gain traction as privacy-focused alternatives. Businesses and governments will explore these options, offering more secure identity verification while addressing ethical and privacy issues associated with facial recognition.


In conclusion, Facial Recognition Technology stands at a crossroads, where its future is shaped by a delicate balance between its undeniable benefits and the profound ethical and technical challenges it presents. The journey we’ve taken through this article highlights the need for ethical innovations, increased regulation, public awareness, and the exploration of alternative technologies. The ethical innovations we discussed seek to harness the potential of facial recognition while safeguarding individual privacy and fairness. Increased regulation, on the other hand, is poised to establish a framework that holds organizations accountable for their use of this technology.

Public opinion and acceptance will play a pivotal role in determining the trajectory of facial recognition. As awareness grows and the public engages in meaningful dialogues about its implications, we can expect more responsible and transparent practices to emerge. Moreover, the search for alternatives and emerging technologies reflects a commitment to addressing the concerns raised by facial recognition. These alternatives offer promising avenues for secure identity verification without compromising on ethical principles.

In the evolving landscape of Facial Recognition Technology, it is imperative that stakeholders, including governments, businesses, and individuals, collaborate to strike the right balance. This balance should allow us to harness the potential of this technology while ensuring that it respects privacy, reduces bias, and adheres to ethical standards. As we move forward, ethical considerations must remain at the forefront of our discussions, ensuring that Facial Recognition Technology benefits society as a whole while safeguarding our fundamental rights and values.

Visit Expand My Business’s website to get started with your company’s new branding journey and follow a strategy that best suits your company’s vision and mission. 


Q1. What is Facial Recognition Technology?

Facial Recognition Technology is an AI-driven system that identifies individuals based on their facial features.

Q2. What are the ethical concerns with facial recognition?

Ethical concerns include privacy invasion, bias, and potential misuse for surveillance.

Q3. How accurate is facial recognition technology?

Accuracy varies but can be as high as 99%, depending on the system and conditions.

Q4. Are there regulations for facial recognition?

Yes, countries like the EU have introduced GDPR, and several US states have implemented laws.

Q5. What are alternatives to facial recognition?

Alternatives include fingerprint recognition, iris scanning, and blockchain-based identity systems.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Related Post

Table of contents