Bitbucket vs GitHub: Choosing the Best Version Control Platform for Your Projects

HomeTechnologySoftwareBitbucket vs GitHub: Choosing the Best Version Control Platform for Your Projects


Key Takeaways

According to Statista, 84% of developers use source code collaboration tools like GitHub and GitLab, highlighting the widespread adoption of these platforms in the software development community​ (InMotion Hosting)​.

The choice between GitHub and Bitbucket often depends on specific team needs, with GitHub leading in community-driven projects and Bitbucket excelling in integrated enterprise environments.

GitHub’s widespread use among developers underscores its robust features and extensive integration capabilities that facilitate efficient project management and collaboration.

Bitbucket’s strengths lie in its seamless integration with other Atlassian products, making it ideal for teams that utilize these tools for comprehensive project management and development.

Version control systems are the backbone of modern software development, offering teams the ability to track changes, collaborate seamlessly, and ensure code integrity. Among these systems, Bitbucket and GitHub stand out as leaders, each with its strengths and unique features. 

As development teams navigate the digital landscape, the question arises: “Which version control platform, Bitbucket or GitHub, holds the key to optimizing project management and code collaboration for your unique needs?”


Version control systems (VCS) are essential tools in modern software development, providing a way to manage code changes over time. They allow multiple developers to work on the same project without conflict, track every modification by each contributor, and revert to previous versions if needed. This system not only enhances collaboration among team members but also serves as a safety net that prevents data loss.

Overview of Version Control Systems

  • Git: Currently the most popular system, Git is favored for its robustness and versatility in handling projects of all sizes. It supports branching and merging, provides tools for visualizing and navigating a non-linear development history, and operates locally, providing speed and full control of the revision history.
  • Subversion (SVN): SVN has been around longer than Git and is centralized. It is simpler to use than Git for those who come from a centralized model, and it is well suited for projects requiring a more linear approach to version control.
  • Mercurial: Similar to Git, Mercurial is a distributed version control system. It is designed for high performance and efficiency in both small and large projects. Mercurial’s interface is more consistent and it arguably simplifies some of the more complex aspects of Git.

Importance of Choosing the Right Platform

  • Productivity and Efficiency: The right version control system can significantly enhance a team’s productivity and efficiency. It ensures that developers can collaborate without stepping on each other’s toes and allows for easy tracking of every change.
  • Project Management: A suitable version control system integrates seamlessly with other tools used in project management, such as issue tracking and continuous integration systems. This integration helps in maintaining a high level of organization and ensures that all parts of the project are aligned.
  • Risk Management: Using version control reduces the risk associated with managing complex software projects. It allows teams to revert to earlier versions if something goes wrong, provides a backup of the project, and facilitates thorough tracking of each change made by developers.

User Interface and Experience

Bitbucket: Streamlined Dashboard, Sidebar Navigation

  • Simplified Navigation: Bitbucket’s user interface is designed for efficiency and ease of use. It features a streamlined dashboard that centralizes all critical operations, from code repository access to issue tracking, within easy reach.
  • Organized Layout: The platform utilizes a sidebar navigation system, which helps users quickly find the tools and sections they need without clutter. This layout is particularly beneficial for new users who are navigating the platform for the first time.
  • Customizable Interface: Bitbucket allows users to customize their dashboard view to better suit their workflow, making it easier to access frequently used features or projects.

GitHub: More Community-Oriented, Social Features

  • Community Engagement: GitHub’s interface is heavily oriented towards fostering a community of developers. It includes features like ‘stars’ and ‘forks’ that not only help users to discover popular projects but also encourage interaction and collaboration among users.
  • Social Coding Environment: The platform promotes social coding by integrating elements that enhance visibility and collaborative potential, such as pull requests and issue tracking, which are accessible directly from the repository page.
  • User-Friendly Project Management: GitHub incorporates project management tools directly into its interface, including boards for task tracking and milestones, making it easier for teams to manage development progress within the community framework.

Pricing and Plans: Bitbucket vs GitHub


  • Free Plan: Offers unlimited private repositories for small teams (up to 5 users) with basic features such as Jira integration and CI/CD with Bitbucket Pipelines.
  • Standard Plan: Costs $3 per user/month. It includes unlimited private repositories for teams larger than 5 users with full CI/CD capabilities and project permissions.
  • Premium Plan: Costs $6 per user/month. This plan adds merge checks, IP whitelisting, deployment permissions, and required two-step verification.


  • Free Plan: Provides unlimited public repositories and private repositories with up to 3 collaborators. Includes basic features like GitHub Actions and package hosting with a limited number of minutes and storage.
  • Team Plan: Costs $4 per user/month. Offers unlimited collaborators, advanced collaboration tools, and 2,000 Actions minutes per month for private repositories.
  • Enterprise Plan: Costs $21 per user/month. Includes advanced audit and compliance capabilities, SAML single sign-on, and 50,000 Actions minutes per month.

These pricing structures make GitHub and Bitbucket competitive choices depending on your team’s size and needs. GitHub may be more appealing for open-source projects or small teams due to its generous free tier. Bitbucket’s pricing becomes more advantageous as team size increases, particularly for teams already using Atlassian’s other products.

Collaboration and Community Features


  • Atlassian Tool Integration:
    • Bitbucket integrates seamlessly with Atlassian products like Jira, Confluence, and Trello.
    • This integration facilitates better project tracking, issue management, and continuous integration and deployment, which is ideal for teams already using these tools.
    • The combined use of these tools can enhance workflow efficiency by keeping all aspects of a project interconnected.
  • Private and Secure Collaboration:
    • Bitbucket offers unlimited private repositories, even in its free plan, making it suitable for startups and businesses that need private collaboration.
    • It provides fine-grained access controls, allowing team leads to manage who can view or edit different parts of the repository.


  • Open-Source Community:
    • GitHub hosts a vast network of over 40 million developers, making it the largest and most active development community globally.
    • It’s the go-to platform for open-source projects, with features that support social interactions like followers, stars, and forks, enhancing visibility and collaborative potential.
  • Social Coding Features:
    • GitHub encourages social coding with features that simplify the process of collaborating, reviewing, and managing software projects.
    • It includes tools like pull requests, issues, and project boards (similar to Kanban boards) that facilitate better communication and project management among team members.
  • GitHub Marketplace:
    • The GitHub Marketplace provides a wide array of third-party apps that extend the functionality of the platform, supporting a myriad of integrations and automation tools.
    • Developers can find tools for continuous integration, code quality checks, and more, which can be integrated directly into their development workflow.

Integration Capabilities

Direct Integrations with Other Tools

  • Bitbucket and GitHub both offer integrations that streamline the development workflow by connecting with a variety of tools.
  • Bitbucket: As part of the Atlassian family, Bitbucket has native integrations with Jira for issue tracking, Trello for project management, and Bamboo for continuous integration and delivery. This seamless integration is particularly beneficial for teams already using other Atlassian products.
  • GitHub: Known for its robust ecosystem, GitHub integrates with many productivity and development tools like Slack for communication, ZenHub for project management, and Azure Pipelines for CI/CD. This extensive range of integrations supports a diverse set of workflows and team sizes.

Marketplace Offerings and Third-Party Extensions

  • Both platforms feature a marketplace that extends the functionality of the core systems with plugins and apps.
  • Bitbucket Marketplace: Offers a variety of third-party apps that enhance its functionality, including tools for code quality, security, and deployment. While it doesn’t have as many apps as GitHub, the available integrations are highly curated to complement the Atlassian environment.
  • GitHub Marketplace: Features a larger array of third-party extensions compared to Bitbucket. It includes hundreds of applications that cover nearly every aspect of software development, from project management and code quality to continuous integration and code review. GitHub’s marketplace is particularly notable for its exclusive apps that cater to a wide range of development needs.

Security and Access Control 

Branch Permissions

  • Bitbucket: Offers detailed branch permission settings that allow admins to control who can push or merge to specific branches. This feature is particularly useful for larger teams where control over the codebase is crucial.
  • GitHub: Provides branch protection rules that can be configured to require pull request reviews, status checks before merging, and even restrict who can push to the branch. This ensures that only approved code makes it to important branches like main or master.

Access Rules

  • Bitbucket: Allows the setting of access levels on a per-user or group basis, enabling fine-grained control over who can view or modify code in the repository. This is ideal for organizations with complex team structures.
  • GitHub: Similar to Bitbucket, GitHub lets repository administrators set access rules that define who can read or write to the repository. GitHub’s team management tools also help in assigning roles that match the organization’s hierarchy and project needs.

IP Whitelisting

  • Bitbucket: Supports IP whitelisting, allowing organizations to specify a range of safe IP addresses from which the repository can be accessed. This adds an extra layer of security by preventing unauthorized access from outside specified locations.
  • GitHub: Though not as prominently featured as in Bitbucket, GitHub also offers IP whitelisting for enterprise accounts, helping secure access to repositories from trusted networks only.

Protected Branches

  • Bitbucket: Protected branches in Bitbucket prevent unauthorized users from deleting or force-pushing to the branch. It also supports the configuration of merge checks to ensure that all changes meet the pre-defined criteria before merging.
  • GitHub: Offers similar functionality where you can designate certain branches as protected. Settings can include preventing force pushes, requiring status checks before merging, and requiring code review approvals, which are crucial for maintaining the integrity of the main codebase.

Special Features and Tools


  • Webhooks:
    • Both Bitbucket and GitHub utilize webhooks, which are automated messages sent from apps when something happens. They are used to trigger CI/CD pipelines or update external issue trackers and collaboration tools.
  • CI/CD Pipelines:
    • Bitbucket Pipelines is an integrated CI/CD service built into Bitbucket. It allows users to automatically build, test, and deploy their code based on a configuration file in their repository.
    • GitHub Actions enables users to automate workflows directly from their GitHub repositories. Users can build, test, and deploy their code by writing individual tasks, called actions, which are run in an automated sequence.

Unique Offerings:

  • GitHub Actions:
    • A powerful automation tool that not only supports CI/CD but also allows for automation of other workflows related to issues, pull requests, and more. It supports a marketplace where users can find and share actions to perform nearly any task they need.
  • Bitbucket Snippets:
    • Bitbucket provides a feature called Snippets, which allows users to save small pieces of code or single files. These snippets can be shared publicly or kept private and can be useful for code reusability or sharing solutions with the community.


When deciding between Bitbucket and GitHub, consider their integration with your team’s tools and workflow. Bitbucket excels with its Atlassian suite integration, perfect for teams needing robust project management. 

Conversely, GitHub is ideal for those valuing its large open-source community and collaborative features. Both platforms offer unique security options, diverse integrations, and various pricing, making your choice dependent on team size, project type, and existing workflows for optimal development efficiency.


What are the primary differences between Bitbucket and GitHub?

Bitbucket is tailored for teams already using Atlassian’s suite of tools, offering tight integration with Jira, Confluence, and Trello. GitHub, however, is favored for its vibrant open-source community and extensive third-party integrations, making it ideal for public projects and collaborative development.

How do Bitbucket and GitHub handle security?

Both platforms offer robust security features. Bitbucket allows IP whitelisting and branch permissions, making it suitable for teams needing stringent security measures. GitHub offers branch protection rules to ensure code changes meet certain criteria before merging, enhancing security and compliance.

What collaboration features are available on Bitbucket and GitHub?

GitHub is renowned for its collaborative features, including issue tracking and a large community for project visibility. Bitbucket offers unique features like Bitbucket Pipelines for integrated CI/CD, which can automate the build, test, and deployment processes directly within the platform.

Which platform is more user-friendly for beginners?

Both platforms are designed with ease of use in mind. GitHub offers a simple, tab-based interface conducive to beginners, while Bitbucket provides a clean dashboard with sidebar navigation that helps users organize and access repositories efficiently.

Software Development Services

Ready for a game-changing Software solution? EMB delivers excellence with 1000+ successful projects and a network of 1500+ top agencies across Asia. Seize success now!

Get Quote

State of Technology 2024

Humanity's Quantum Leap Forward

Explore 'State of Technology 2024' for strategic insights into 7 emerging technologies reshaping 10 critical industries. Dive into sector-wide transformations and global tech dynamics, offering critical analysis for tech leaders and enthusiasts alike, on how to navigate the future's technology landscape.

Read Now

How do the pricing models of Bitbucket and GitHub compare?

GitHub offers unlimited public repositories for free, which is advantageous for open-source projects. Bitbucket provides free private repositories for small teams up to five users, making it a better option for startups and small businesses needing private code storage at no cost.

Related Post